Literature Review of Regeneration Scheme Evaluations

About this project

Explore the people, research centres and partner organisations behind this project.

Get in touch

Contact CRESR to discuss partnerships, doctoral research and more

Contact CRESR

Literature Review of Regeneration Scheme Evaluations

Project Director: Peter Wells
Project Duration: 2019

Regeneration is back on the political agenda, with the announcement of the Stronger Towns Fund and work to set up a Shared Prosperity Fund to replace targeted EU funding. There is a recognition at policy level that the ‘proceeds of growth’ are unequally distributed.

This presents an opportunity to rediscover the role of targeted funding, and the part housing-related activity can play in uplifting ‘left-behind’ neighbourhoods. Importantly, it also presents an opportunity to learn from three decades of experience within the UK and internationally.

Key issues highlighted in previous learning include how much should be spent; how the spend should be targeted; how it should link with mainstream public spending; how need should be defined; how long a programme should last; what geographical focus is appropriate; and what outcomes and impacts should be expected. This report addresses summarises key learning on outcomes, value for money, determining factors and lessons learned.

The project team also included Julian Dobson (Urban Pollinators).

About this project

Explore the people, research centres and partner organisations behind this project.

Get in touch

Contact CRESR to discuss partnerships, doctoral research and more

Contact CRESR

Research team

Richard Crisp 207523

Richard Crisp

Reader

Richard Crisp's profile
Tony Gore

Tony Gore

Research Fellow

Peter Wells 28583

Peter Wells

Professor of Public Policy Analysis and Evaluation

Peter Wells's profile